“Kamala Harris,” James
Howard Kunstler pithily noticed, “was simply pulled out of a
hat, like a rabbit. And all people concerned knew she was a dud, a gradual learner,
inattentive, not well-educated, lazy, presumably excessive quite a lot of the time,
self-medicating on account of nervousness, insecurity, purposelessness.”
But faculty professors overwhelmingly help Kamala Harris
over Donald Trump for the presidency. In keeping with an Inside
Larger Training ballot, 78
% of school professors plan to vote for Harris on November fifth, whereas
solely 8 % stated they’ll vote for Trump.
Why? As a result of a excessive proportion of school school
members—like Kamala Harris—are lazy.
On faculty campuses throughout America, rigor and self-discipline have
collapsed. Grade inflation is rampant as a result of professors are lazy. It is too rattling onerous for an teacher to differentiate between an A examination paper and a B. It is simpler to provide
each scholar an A grade. Even at Harvard, the nation’s most elite college, 80 % of undergraduate college students have an A- grade common.
Tutorial evaluation in graduate applications is sort of
nonexistent. Most graduate college students get A or B grades, and plagiarism isn’t any
longer a critical tutorial offense.
Once more, Harvard is an instance. Harvard president Claudine Homosexual
was accused of plagiarizing passages in her
dissertation and three
tutorial articles. Harvard investigated these allegations and cleared her
of any intentional wrongdoing. In any case, plagiarism is not an act of
tutorial dishonesty. It is merely an indication of laziness, and laziness is
not a sin on the earth of American increased schooling.
We shouldn’t be stunned to be taught that lazy faculty
professors help Kamala Harris, a lazy vice chairman who needs to develop into our
lazy president.
![]() |
| Kamala needs to be president. How onerous can the job be? |




